Design and validation of a scale to evaluate Common Good Leadership

Claudia  Malcón Cervera; Cynthia Maria Montaudon Tomas; Ingrid N. Pinto-López; Manuel Alejandro Gutiérrez González

Design and validation of a scale to evaluate Common Good Leadership

Claudia Malcón Cervera, Cynthia Maria Montaudon Tomas, Ingrid N. Pinto-López, Manuel Alejandro Gutiérrez González

UPAEP Universidad

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article shows the design and validation of a scale to measure common good leadership. The scale was developed by identifying and incorporating traits and skills or different leadership styles associated with the common good. The Common Good Leadership Scale (CGLS) is developed using gap analysis to reduce the possibility of overconfidence bias. The process of scale design and development is described. Items analyze the ideals regarding common good leadership and specific actions that are performed in an attempt to achieve the common good. The gap is obtained by subtracting the actions minus the ideals, providing valuable information about the leadership traits and skills that need to be developed. Different tests were performed to ensure the validity of the scale including factor analysis.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	80-109
Number of pages	30
Journal	Ethics, Economics, and Common Goods
Volume	18
Issue number	2
State	Published - 1 Jul 2022

Access to Document

https://journal.upaep.mx/index.php/EthicsEconomicsandCommonGoods/article/view/20License: CC BY-NC-SA

Cite this

@article{e1ab43f3adfe42999fca76ade26bc7c4,

title = "Design and validation of a scale to evaluate Common Good Leadership",

abstract = "This article shows the design and validation of a scale to measure common good leadership. The scale was developed by identifying and incorporating traits and skills or different leadership styles associated with the common good. The Common Good Leadership Scale (CGLS) is developed using gap analysis to reduce the possibility of overconfidence bias. The process of scale design and development is described. Items analyze the ideals regarding common good leadership and specific actions that are performed in an attempt to achieve the common good. The gap is obtained by subtracting the actions minus the ideals, providing valuable information about the leadership traits and skills that need to be developed. Different tests were performed to ensure the validity of the scale including factor analysis.",

keywords = "Common good leadership scale, Design, Validation",

author = "{Malc{\'o}n Cervera}, Claudia and Tomas, {Cynthia Maria Montaudon} and Pinto-L{\'o}pez, {Ingrid N.} and {Guti{\'e}rrez Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Manuel Alejandro}",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "18",

pages = "80--109",

journal = "Ethics, Economics, and Common Goods",

issn = "2954-4254",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design and validation of a scale to evaluate Common Good Leadership

AU - Malcón Cervera, Claudia

AU - Tomas, Cynthia Maria Montaudon

AU - Pinto-López, Ingrid N.

AU - Gutiérrez González, Manuel Alejandro

PY - 2022/7/1

Y1 - 2022/7/1

N2 - This article shows the design and validation of a scale to measure common good leadership. The scale was developed by identifying and incorporating traits and skills or different leadership styles associated with the common good. The Common Good Leadership Scale (CGLS) is developed using gap analysis to reduce the possibility of overconfidence bias. The process of scale design and development is described. Items analyze the ideals regarding common good leadership and specific actions that are performed in an attempt to achieve the common good. The gap is obtained by subtracting the actions minus the ideals, providing valuable information about the leadership traits and skills that need to be developed. Different tests were performed to ensure the validity of the scale including factor analysis.

AB - This article shows the design and validation of a scale to measure common good leadership. The scale was developed by identifying and incorporating traits and skills or different leadership styles associated with the common good. The Common Good Leadership Scale (CGLS) is developed using gap analysis to reduce the possibility of overconfidence bias. The process of scale design and development is described. Items analyze the ideals regarding common good leadership and specific actions that are performed in an attempt to achieve the common good. The gap is obtained by subtracting the actions minus the ideals, providing valuable information about the leadership traits and skills that need to be developed. Different tests were performed to ensure the validity of the scale including factor analysis.

KW - Common good leadership scale

KW - Design

KW - Validation

M3 - Article

SN - 2954-4254

VL - 18

SP - 80

EP - 109

JO - Ethics, Economics, and Common Goods

JF - Ethics, Economics, and Common Goods

IS - 2

ER -