Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Assessing Workplace Violence: Methodological Considerations

  • Nicola Magnavita(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Francesca Larese Filon
    ,
  • ,
  • Igor Meraglia
    ,
  • Francesco Chirico
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
    ,
  • Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS
    ,
  • Occupational Health Unit
    ,
  • Department of Life Sciences and Public Health
    ,
  • University of Trieste
    ,
  • Unit of Occupational Medicine
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Research
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

e2024003

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Medicina del Lavoro (Volume 115, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 22/02/2024

Publication status

Published - 22/02/2024

ISSN

0025-7818

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85185656720
  • PubMed: 38411977

Abstract

The risk of violence is present in all workplaces. It must be accurately assessed to establish prevention and protection measures tailored to the features of each situation. The risk management process requires compliance in a sequential order: i) risk identification, ii) quantitative risk assessment, and iii) impact assessment. Gathering workers’ experiences using lists, focus groups, or participatory ergonomics groups is necessary to identify the phenomenon. For risk assessment, spontaneous reporting of events is often insufficient. It may be complemented with two methods: systematic recording of violent events that occurred in the past year during periodic medical examinations of workers and targeted surveys. The epidemiological analysis of data from individual interviews and surveys provides the phenomenon’s prevalence, incidence, and evolution. Moreover, reporting the harm suffered by victims of violence allows constructing impact matrices to allocate resources where they are most needed.

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.63
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
21
Captures
34