Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Cardiorespiratory fitness and fat oxidation during exercise as protective factors for insulin resistance in sedentary women with overweight or obesity

  • Javiera Cancino-Ramírez
    ,
  • Johana Soto-Sánchez
    ,
  • ,
  • Manuel Moreno González
    ,
  • Bárbara Leyton-Dinamarca
    ,
  • Luis González-Rojas
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 312-317 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Nutricion Hospitalaria (Volume 35, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/2018

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2018

ISSN

0212-1611

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85045059304
  • PubMed: 29756963

Abstract

Introduction: obesity is a global pandemic and it is the biggest risk factor for death worldwide nowadays. Studies suggest that both cardiorespiratory fitness and fat oxidation in exercise are related to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and they could be used as metabolic fitness markers. Objectives: the aim of this study is to determine if cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2) and fat oxidation during exercise are protective factors of insulin resistance (IR) in sedentary women with obesity or overweight. Methods: sixty women were selected for fat oxidation analysis and 55 for cardiorespiratory fitness analysis that fitted the inclusion and exclusion criteria. VO2, maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and the intensity where MFO is reached (FATmax) were determined through an incremental test on a cycle ergometer with gas analysis. The subjects with a Homeostatic model assessment of IR index greater or equal to 2.5 were considered as insulin-resistant. Participants were divided into 2 groups, IR group (n = 38) and Non-IR group (n = 22). Results: VO2(%) and MFO were lower in the IR group (76.1% vs. 83.2%; p = 0.015 and 1.08 mg × kg-1 × min-1 vs. 1.62 mg × kg-1 × min-1; p = 0.044, respectively) compared to the Non-IR group. There was an association between VO2(%) and IR (OR = 0.92, p = 0.017) and between MFO and IR (OR = 0.52, p = 0.035), both models adjusted for age and body mass index. Conclusions: VO2(%) and MFO are independent protective factors for IR. No association was found between FATmax and IR.

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.46

PlumX, opens in new tab

Usage
510
11
Captures
92