High-speed resistance training is more effective than low-speed resistance training to increase functional capacity and muscle performance in older women
- Rodrigo Ramírez-Campilloc(Author),
- Angélica Castilloc(Author),
- Carlos I. de la Fuenteg(Author),
- Christian Campos-Jarag(Author),
- David C. Andradef(Author),
- Cristian Álvarezh(Author)
- aUniversity of Beira Interior,
- bUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro,
- cUniversidad de Los Lagos,
- dPublic University of Navarre,
- eUniversidad de la Frontera,
- fClínica MEDS
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 51-57 (7 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Experimental Gerontology (Volume 58)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/01/2014
Publication status
ISSN
0531-5565External Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84904751731
- PubMed: 25014621
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effects of 12weeks of high-speed resistance training (RT) versus low-speed RT on muscle strength [one repetition of maximum leg-press (1RMLP) and bench-press (1RMBP), plus dominant (HGd) and non-dominant maximum isometric handgrip], power [counter-movement jump (CMJ), ball throwing (BT) and 10-m walking sprint (S10)], functional performance [8-foot up-and-go test (UG) and sit-to-stand test (STS)], and perceived quality of life in older women. Methods: 45 older women were divided into a high-speed RT group [EG, n. = 15, age. = 66.3. ±. 3.7. y], a low-speed RT group [SG, n. = 15, age. = 68.7. ±. 6.4. y] and a control group [CG, n. = 15, age. = 66.7. ±. 4.9. y]. The SG and EG were submitted to a similar 12-week RT program [3 sets of 8 reps at 40-75% of the one-repetition maximum (1. <. RM), CMJ and BT] using slow, controlled (3. s) concentric muscle actions for the SG and using fast, explosive (<. 1. s) concentric muscle actions for the EG (20% less work per exercise without CMJ and BT). Results: Over the 12-week training period, both RT groups showed small to large clinically significant improvements in the dependent variables; however, a significant difference was found between the EG and SG for the performance changes in BT, S10 and UG (20% vs. 11%, p. <. 0.05; 14% vs. 9%, p. <. 0.05; 18% vs. 10%, p. <. 0.01; respectively). No significant changes were observed for the CG. Conclusion: Both RT interventions are effective in improving functional capacity, muscle performance and quality of life in older women, although a high-speed RT program induces greater improvements in muscle power and functional capacity.
