How and When May Technostress Impact Workers’ Psycho-Physical Health and Work-Family Interface? A Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
- Valentina Sommovigod(Author),
- Chiara Bernuzzie(Author),
- Georgia Libera Finstadf(Author),
- Ilaria Settie(Author),
- Paola Gabanellic(Author),
- ,
- ,
- cIRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri S.p.A. SB - Pavia,
- dUniversity of Rome La Sapienza,
- eUniversity of Pavia,
- fEuropean University of Rome
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishArticle number
1266Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Volume 20, Issue 2)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/01/2023
Publication status
ISSN
1661-7827External Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85146710153
- PubMed: 36674020
Abstract
Although a growing body of research has analyzed the determinants and effects of technostress, it is still unclear how and when technostress would impact workers’ psycho-physical health and work-family interface during the pandemic. To fill this gap, this study tests the mediating mechanisms and the boundary conditions associated with the impact of technostress on workers’ psycho-physical well-being and work-family conflict. A total of 266 Italian workers completed online questionnaires measuring (traditional vs. remote) working modalities, technostress, fear of COVID-19, working excessively, psycho-physical distress, work-family conflict, loss of a loved one due to COVID-19, and resilience. Structural equation models were performed. Results indicated that technostress was positively related to psycho-physical distress and work-family conflict, as mediated by fear of COVID-19 and working excessively, respectively. The loss of a loved one exacerbated the effects of fear of COVID-19 on psycho-physical health, while resilience buffered the effects of working excessively on work-family conflict. Since numerous organizations intend to maintain remote working also after the COVID-19 emergency, it is crucial to study this phenomenon during its peaks of adoption, to prevent its potential negative outcomes. The implications of these findings for theory and practice are discussed.
