The Political Relevance of Having a Good Command of Language. From Aristotle and Christianism to the Sides of Good Governance in Hispanic America
- Joaquín García-Huidobr,
- ,
- José Antonio Poblete
- Universidad de los Andes Chile
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
SpanishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 353-373 (21 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos (Issue 44)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/01/2022
Publication status
ISSN
0716-5455Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85140780070
Abstract
Within the civil legislation of viceregal America, there is a series of precepts that punish obscene language. It is possible to identify the origin of these precepts, so alien to our current mentality, in the confluence of two traditions that contributed to shape the common sense of the time. On one hand, Aristotle's Politics justifies such a prohibition by establishing a causal relationship between obscene speech and immoral behavior. On the other, based on the observation that "from the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks," Christian Tradition emphasizes the negative consequences of exposure to obscene conversations. The Christian commentators of Aristotle, finally, linked both perspectives, showing how from a heart made impure by obscenities sprout seriously unjust actions, not only in the order of sexuality. Thus, they conclude that this type of language should be forbidden by authority.
