Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Misinformation of COVID-19 on the internet: Infodemiology study

  • Jose Yunam Cuan-Baltazar
    ,
  • Maria José Muñoz-Perez
    ,
  • Carolina Robledo-Vega
    ,
  • Maria Fernanda Pérez-Zepeda
    ,
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

e18444

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (Volume 6, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/04/2020

Publication status

Published - 01/04/2020

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85090200414

Abstract

Background: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. Methods: The search was based on the term “Wuhan Coronavirus” on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2” (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. Results: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. Conclusions: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
26.15

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
2
Captures
692
467