Image Classification Applied to the Detection of Leather Defects for Smart Manufacturing
- Alberto Ochoa-Zezatti,
- Oliverio Cruz-Mejía(corresponding author),
- Jose Mejia,
- Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez,
- Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico,
Publication Information
Tipo di output
Lingua originale
EnglishPagine da-a (Numero di pagine)
Pagine 52-61 (10 pagine)Attività cardine della pubblicazione
- Published - 01/01/2021
Stato pubblicazione
Editore/-rice
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHSerie di pubblicazioni
- Nome della serie di pubblicazioni: Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST
ISSN (cartaceo): 1867-8211
ISSN (elettronico): 1867-822X
Volume: 359
ISBN (cartaceo)
9783030698386Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85103248920
Titolo pubblicazione host
Computer Science and Health Engineering in Health Services - 4th EAI International Conference, COMPSE 2020, ProceedingsEditor pubblicazione host
- José Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo
- Pandian Vasant
- Igor Litvinchev
- Roman Rodriguez-Aguilar
- Felix Martinez-Rios
Abstract
In the shoe production workshops, animal leather is used as the main raw material. Generally, an operator manually checks the surface of the leather, making sure that it does not present defects that compromise the quality of the final product. This type of inspection is subject to human error and uncontrollable factors, which represents an opportunity for the automation of the process through a system of artificial vision. A data set was developed consisting of images of animal leather, in good coordination and with defects. The digitized samples were subjected to image processing using OpenCV and Scikit-Learn, and then used in a convolutional neural network interfacing, using TensorFlow’s Keras library in Python. Finally, the trained model is capable of classifying new images into two possible groups: “Defective Leather” and “Defect-free Leather”. The trained model offers 80% predictive accuracy and 85% reliability. Although the result can be considered satisfactory, it is expected to raise the mentioned percentage with a more robust data set than the one used for the project.
