Passa alla casella di ricercaPassa alla navigazionePassa al contenuto principale

Measuring the Real Relationship in Psychotherapy: Initial Validation of the Therapist Form.

  • Charles J. Gelso
    ,
  • Frances A. Kelley
    ,
  • Jairo N. Fuertes
    ,
  • Cheri Marmarosh
    ,
  • Stacey E. Holmes
    ,
  • Catarina Costa
  • Divine Mercy University
    ,
  • Department of Counseling and Personnel Services, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
    ,
  • Department of Measurement, Statistics and Evaluation, University of Maryland.
    ,
  • Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Louisiana Tech University.
    ,
  • Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.
    ,
  • Graduate School of Education, Fordham University at Lincoln Center.
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer review

Publication Information

Tipo di output

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer review

Lingua originale

English

Pagine da-a (Numero di pagine)

Pagine 640-649 (10 pagine)

Rivista (volume, numero edizione)

Journal of Counseling Psychology (Volume 52, Edizione 4)

Attività cardine della pubblicazione

  • Published - 01/10/2005

Stato pubblicazione

Published - 01/10/2005

ISSN

0022-0167

Abstract

The development and initial validation of a therapist-rated measure of the real relationship in psychotherapy (the Real Relationship Inventory—Therapist Form [RRI-T]) is reported. Using a sample (n = 80) of practicing psychotherapists and on the basis of prior theory, the authors developed a 24-item measure consisting of 2 subscales (Realism and Genuineness) and a total score. This 24-item version and other measures used for validation were completed by 79 additional practicing therapists and 51 counseling graduate students (n = 130). The RRI-T was found to have high reliability and sound initial validity. As theorized, the RRI-T correlated significantly with measures of working alliance, session outcome (depth and smoothness), client intellectual and emotional insight, and client negative transference. Discriminant validity was supported by a nonsignificant relation to social desirability.

Access to documents

Publication metrics